|
The Laurex Process: Strategy Clarification
Real Estate
Investing in a Rising Rate Environment
By Ray Alcorn
With interest rates headed
upward yet again because of the latest round of belt tightening by the
Federal Reserve, and the stock market falling with no bottom in sight,
many people are crying doom and gloom. I hear talk of watching for a
rise in foreclosures because of stock market losses. Builder friends are
convinced they are about to be ruined. In my opinion, this is no time to
rush for the exits. The fundamentals of real estate investing are sound.
A short history lesson may prove worthwhile.
My experience goes back to 1980-82, when I was a single-family home
builder. Now that was tight money. With prime in the high teens, very
few deals made any financial sense for lender or borrower. Then came the
five years of favorable tax treatment that made dumb and dumber deals
look good... until Congress pulled the plug on passive losses. Then we
had to re-learn an old lesson: if it doesn't cash flow, it's not a
deal.
The recession of 1990-91 was a cakewalk for those who weren't
over-leveraged... I wasn't one of them and paid dearly for the mistake.
Fast forward to 1998, we were riding what has now become the longest
economic expansion in history. Asia went ape, the Russian ruble turns to
rubble, and the markets gave a physics lesson… what goes up, does come
down. The Fed cut rates, everything settled down, and for the most part
it was business as usual on Main Street. But for the first time we got
an up close and personal look at how interconnected this global economy
has become.
Now it's the year 2000. Y2K turned out to be a non-event, though it took
the blame for a general slowdown in activity in fourth quarter 1999. Gas
prices are at record levels, yet spending remains strong. Why? Are we
heading for recession? Does it matter? How do we plan for the next five
or ten years?
One fact remains constant for the real estate industry. Our health and
well-being has always been tied to the availability and the cost of debt
capital. That is to say that as long as we as investors have access to
reasonably priced financing for our properties, we can survive in any
market. I learned in 1991 that it wasn't enough to have equity, property
has to cash flow as well. I also learned that when I can present my
company as a stable enterprise, insulated from the uncertainty of highly
speculative investments, lenders will roll out the red carpet for my
deals.
Always Follow the Money
If then we are dependent on debt capital to fuel our operations, it is
important that we as investors understand what influences and moves the
markets in way that affect the cost of our funds.
The first thing to know when listening to the gloom and doom reports in
the media is that they have little knowledge about any business other
than reporting what people tell them is important. When they report the
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), they are using the implied
credibility of a well-known financial measuring stick for a good
news/bad news sound bite under the assumption that you know what it
means. Most of us don't.
The DJIA is made up of thirty companies, picked to represent a cross
section of the economy. To put that number in perspective, there are
3090 companies listed on the NYSE, 771 on AMEX, and over 6500 on NASDAQ.
The DJIA companies represent approximately one-fifth of the value of all
US stocks, and about one-fourth of the value of the stocks listed on the
NYSE. This "average" isn't designed to predict anything, but rather to
track the general trend of where the market has BEEN. Trying to gauge
where the economy is headed by watching the stock market is much like
dressing for Alaska with only the knowledge that it has an average
temperature of 55 degrees.
The result, as Nobel-laureate economist Paul A. Samuelson put it: "The
market has predicted nine of the last five recessions."
But the market is an indicator of the collective perceptions of the
investment world. When political turmoil hits, as we saw in Asia and
Russia in 1998, money will flee quickly to safety and liquidity. Money
doesn't care who owns it, but it despises instability and uncertainty.
"Tight credit" is another way of saying "minimize risk." Stocks carry
risk, and therefore when things get dicey, money moves into low-risk
investments, causing the price of stocks to fall. The present tech-stock
fallout is another indication that the market perceives the risks to
outweigh the potential rewards.
Conversely, as the low risk investments (namely government bonds also
known as T-bills) come into higher demand because they are both safe and
liquid, the price of those bonds will rise. As the price of a bond
rises, the yield drops. Many commercial and residential mortgage loans
use the yield of government bonds (or T-bills) as the index for the
interest rate charged on the loan. The interest amount over the index
rate is known as the spread, generally quoted in basis points (100 basis
points = 1 percentage point) over the index rate.
This is the element of commercial lending that falls into chaos in a
scenario like we witnessed in 1998.
Again, a lesson from our recent past can best illustrate the point. As
the benchmark 30 year and 10 year T-bills soared to record prices, the
yields dropped to record lows. Lenders, especially the conduit programs
for Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) on Wall Street, were
caught in a classic squeeze. They had untold millions of dollars
committed at spreads agreed upon months earlier with no warning of any
trouble on the horizon, and were faced with funding these commitments at
interest rates below their cost of funds. The market took six months to
readjust to the new paradigm, and spreads have returned to manageable
levels.
But the most interesting development to the Wall Street debacle was the
way commercial banks and credit companies moved quickly to fill the
void. Since the waves in the market were not from any instability in the
collateral, i.e. real estate, the money became available from other
sources. In short, the markets corrected the inefficiencies, and money
flow resumed when certainty and stability were again in place.
What does this mean to the average real estate investor? It means money
continues to be available for deals that make sense. That rates are a
tick or two higher will not make a strong deal weak, or a weak deal
undoable. It must make sense.
So how do we determine which investments actually make sense?
Main Street vs. Wall Street
The fundamentals of the real estate industry have not changed. The Wall
Street players, and the relatively recent use of the CMBS to capitalize
real estate, have not captured so much of the market as to control
access to debt capital. Commercial banks, insurance companies, and to a
certain extent pension funds, are still the mainstay of real estate
funding. However, some sectors of real estate are going to be harder to
finance due to the effects of other market factors and may be best
justify to those players big enough to weather the storm.
Hotels, for instance, have been on the brink of overbuilding for the
past two years, and the alarm was sounded for a slowdown in room growth
completely independent of the global financial problems or the cost of
oil. This is not to say that there will be no hotels built for the next
year. But the ones that are built will most likely have a strong
franchise, a killer location, and a verifiable market. In short, the
deal will make sense from a hospitality business standpoint, not as a
speculative real estate project.
One side note on oil: We must be aware that this one commodity has the
power to move our markets in ways we don't even fully fathom. Being in
the hotel business, I watch the price of gasoline for the obvious effect
it has on travel. I started getting nervous last December when prices
topped $1.40 and no one was saying anything. In mid-January OPEC
intimated it would vote to increase production at its spring meeting in
Geneva, but that the increase would be too late to affect prices during
the summer travel season. I was still concerned, but relieved that OPEC
was not going to take a hard line ala 1973. Then the media, in their
usual clumsy manner, finally noticed the price of gas in late March and
sounded the alarm. Mind you, the problem was already solved, and now the
media and the government wanted to get in front of the crowd and take
credit for fixing a problem they hadn't even noticed until it was over.
Some say the clumsy handling and belated pressure from Washington
actually made it harder for OPEC to do what they had already planned to
do, lest it look like they were caving into pressure from the US. I get
nervous when government actually acts. I'd much rather see gridlock.
Watch the Right Numbers
For the market as a whole, the base demographics that real estate relies
on remain solid. Looking at the industry through the lens of a few
select property types can offer insights into where we are headed in
general, as well as highlight specific islands of opportunity.
Mobile Home Parks remain strong, and are in fact category killers when
it comes to valuations. The REIT's have scarped up most of the
investment grade parks, and are now homing in on the larger parks of B
and C grade to soak up the cash being made available for the product.
This serves to drive up the valuations of formerly unattractive parks,
and ever-restrictive zoning standards across the country combine to give
this property type one of the highest potential returns available in
real estate. The demand for affordable housing continues to grow, and
mobile home sales are predicted by the Manufactured Housing Institute to
continue to comprise about 30% of single family housing sales.
Commercial growth and development remains strong. Reacting to a
perceived threat from Internet sales, traditional retailers have found
they can compete in a hi-tech, hi-touch environment, and that online
activity in fact boosts in-store sales.
Online spending has in fact created a mini-boom in warehouse and
distribution facilities. Commercial occupancies reported to the
International Council of Shopping Centers are averaging in the nineties.
Retail spending remains strong. Consumer credit, while higher in dollar
amounts, is in fact the least we have seen in recent years as a
percentage of income. The income and employment levels of the population
as a whole are the strongest in history, which in turn drives spending,
and are the key indicators for the near term economy.
The National Association of Home Builders predicts single family housing
starts to fall somewhat in 2000, but still average over 1.3 million
starts, more than double the starts in 1982, and 50% higher than the
840,000 starts in 1991. This is good news for rental property owners
without being bad news for builders. Apartments have both permanent and
bridge financing products available to fit almost any scenario. Rates
can range from the mid 7% range to a point higher in most parts of the
country. Debt coverage ratios on even marginal properties are in the
1.15-1.25 range, certainly not an indication of overly tight money.
Rents are rising faster now, due in part to rising residential mortgage
rates, which are cooling home sales. Occupancies remain strong as a
reflection of the record low unemployment rates we have enjoyed in the
past several years.
These are the fundamental demographics that control our industry. In
short, if a deal is really a deal, it will make sense on these factors,
and it can be funded and profited from, global financial hiccups and
market swings aside.
The Roaring 2000's
I recently read a book titled The Roaring 2000s, by Harry S. Dent. In it
he predicts that the greatest economic expansion in history will occur
in the first decade of this new century. He bases his predictions on the
population curve and spending patterns of the baby boom generation, and
a multitude of other long-term trends that are operative in our economy.
I tend to agree with his analysis (and highly recommend the book) and
believe that some of the highest appreciation gains in real estate ever
seen will occur in the next eight to ten years.
Now is the time to position our income real estate for maximum
valuations. That means making capital improvements with the cheapest
money we can find, and raising rents on the strength of the completed
improvements. Take this opportunity to examine service contracts,
evaluate expense trends, and check utility consumption. If you're
looking at an acquisition, make sure it makes good business sense. The
formula for growth now, as in the past, is "Create stability to attract
funds." Remember that lenders are in the business of loaning money for
the purpose of gaining a return… and they're counting on us to bring
them deals that make sense for all parties.
Unless the world can solve Asia's debt problems, bring political
stability to Russia, hold up the weather in Mexico, and turn the
Eurodollar into the United States of Europe, all in the next year, there
is no where else but the US for world money to hide. And once it gets
here, it won't be happy with a 4.5% T-bill yield for long. Will we be
ready? Will we have the product available to invest in when the time
comes? As the market weeds out the uncertainty, good deals will get
better, and the quick will reap the profits. I intend to be in front of
the line.
Ray Alcorn is the Chief Operating Officer of Park Real Estate,
Inc., located in Blacksburg Virginia. Park was founded in 1953 by Ray's
father as a real estate development and investment firm. The firm owns a
diverse portfolio of commercial investment properties, presently
including a hotel, a mobile home park, several apartment buildings, a
shopping center and two bowling alleys. Plans for the future include the
acquisition, divesture and development of additional retail and hotel
properties in the southeast.
Article Provided by:
Ray Alcorn
Park Real Estate, Inc. |