|
The Laurex Process:
Exit Strategy Implementation
Is the Real Estate “Bubble” Going to Burst?
By Bill Bronchick
A lot of “hoopla” has been floating around the news media
lately about the “bubble theory” of real estate, that is, the theory that the
real estate market is going to burst. In my opinion, this theory has no
merit.
First, understand that there are three basic premises that undermine the
discussion of a real estate “bubble”:
-
There
is no “national” real estate market
-
The
real estate market doesn’t explode or crash
-
The
market has limited relevancy to the shrewd investor.
-
The
Real Estate "Market" is a Compilation of Local Economies
When people speak of the real estate “economy,” they are using nationally-
based statistics. For example, Fortune Magazine reported recently that since
the early 1960’s, average residential real estate values have never had a
down year. This statement is true, but while these numbers are measurable,
they do not reflect the intricacies of local real estate markets.
The stock market is based on the national, even the world economy. The real
estate market is based on local, and, in many cases, micro-local economies.
For example, California foreclosures are down 7% overall from last year, but
up 17% in San Francisco (due, in no small part, to the fizzle of DOT COM
companies). And, within a particular city that is doing well, there may be
certain neighborhoods doing poorly for a variety of reasons, such as
over-building of new homes. So while statistics, calculations and economic
factors are relevant, so is common sense - take a look around and see what's
really happening. Talk to real estate agents, investors and lenders in your
area for a better picture of what is going on.
Real Estate Markets do not “Crash”
We all remember October 19, 1987, known as “Black Monday.” The stock market
lost 22% of its value in one day - what investors call a “crash.” History
points to times which real estate values have taken 22% hits in certain
cities and in pockets within cities. However, no real estate market dropped
22% in one day, one week or even one month. In fact, the real estate “crash”
of the late 1980’s took several years to bottom out in most markets.
As Money Magazine reported recently, “high prices themselves don't
necessarily indicate a bubble. For that, you also need excess supply. Factors
that inhibit supply -- zoning laws that limit building, for example -- may
prevent a bubble from forming.” And, according the National Association of
Realtors, the supply of homes is not exceeding demand in most cities. Combine
limited supply of houses, low interest rates that are not going up soon and a
baby-boomer generation in its prime house-buying years, and it is not likely
we will see a collapse any time soon.
Finally, keep in mind that even if a real estate market is reaching a peak
within a particular area, it doesn’t necessary mean it will necessarily
collapse. The fact that real estate values in your city have climbed at twice
the rate of inflation last year and only half the rate of inflation this year
doesn’t mean the bottom is falling out. And, just because your city’s average
real estate values or home sales went down, doesn’t mean it went down
everywhere in the city. Case in point, Denver, Colorado – excess supply of
high-end homes has driven down values, but the low-end “starter” homes (the
bread and butter of real estate investors) have suffered no loss. The problem
is, people see headlines like "Average Real Estate Prices Falling"
and they panic. Declining values of $1,000,000 homes skews the average, so you
can't pay attention to broad numbers. You need to look specifically in the
price range and location of houses you are buying.
The Market Has Limited Relevancy to the Shrewd Investor
If you buy and hold for the long term (15 + years), you aren't likely to
lose. Real estate values generally go up in the long run, with few
exceptions. The same is probably true of the stock market in the long run,
but there's one problem: there's no guarantee any company you invest in will
be in business in 15 years - not even Xerox, IBM or AOL!
If you buy and flip properties quickly, the market appreciation or decline is
not all that relevant to your profit. I had this discussion when I appeared
CNBC recently; if the local real estate market is "hot" you can sell
a property quickly, but you can't buy it as cheap. If the local real estate
market is weak, you can steal properties, but you have to account for a
longer hold period when you resell. It is relevant to know where your market
is CURRENTLY going (up or down), but don't worry so much about the
"bubble" bursting - real estate markets don't collapse (or explode)
in 3 to 6 months.
On the other hand, if you are buying properties with negative cash flow with
the expectation of the values increasing over 2-3 years, shame on you! What
if the values decrease? What's your backup plan? Can you rent it for
break-even cash flow? Can you sustain negative cash flow until the market
rebounds? If so, then don't sweat it - you'll also pick up a whole bunch more
properties at the bottom of the real estate cycle. If not, then you are a
“speculator,” not an investor, and you are at the whim of factors beyond your
control. Such activity is very risky, to say the least.
The bottom line is, the real estate market may go up, and then again, it may
go down. So what? Don't bank on appreciation, buy properties below market,
and have a "plan B" if it doesn't work out. Do this, and the you
will see that the "bubble theory" is full of hot air.
Article Provided by:
Bill
Bronchick
Legalwiz Publications
|