|
The Laurex Process: Exit
Strategy Implementation
1031
Tax-Deferred Exchanges
By
Greg Lehrmann
Real estate investing is similar to playing Monopoly. Winning
at either takes savvy and the skill to negotiate the exchange of less
desirable properties for more valuable ones. Texas property owners intent
on winning should understand the many benefits of Internal Revenue Code
section 1031 tax-deferred exchanges.
Tax-deferred
exchanges have been in the tax code since 1921 and are among the
significant tax advantages for real estate investors. The key advantage of
a 1031 exchange is that it allows an investor to dispose of a property
without incurring a capital gain tax liability. This allows the earning
power of the deferred taxes to work for the benefit of the investor
instead of the government.
Creative Exchange
Strategies
As tax code rules and cases have evolved
overwhelmingly in favor of taxpayers - especially with regard to real
estate - exchanges have become easier. A seller hires a 1031 qualified
intermediary (QI) to document the sale of a property as an exchange. The
QI holds the proceeds to prevent the seller from being in a taxable
situation. Potential replacement property is identified within 45 days
after closing, and some or all of those properties are acquired within 180
total days after the sale. For real estate exchanges, the properties just
need to be used in the exchanger's business or held as an investment. This
format is called the delayed exchange.
Although the
delayed exchange variation is the most common, many exchangers employ more
creative strategies, such as reverse exchanges. A 1031 reverse exchange is
called for when the replacement property must be acquired before closing
on the relinquished property (if for example, a prime property is listed
in a hot market, investors would have to write a contract quickly to
compete with other prospective buyers).
Previously, reverse
exchanges were used infrequently because the IRS offered no guidance on
the topic. Reverse exchanges were considered a gray area, and taxpayers
either proceeded with caution or chose to avoid them.
'Parking' Properties
In the past, there
were three basic approaches to reverse exchanges: the "pure" reverse
approach, the exchange-first (relinquished property parked) approach and
the exchange-last (replacement property parked) approach. The first was
dismissed by most QIs because the exchanger cannot own the relinquished
property and the replacement property at the same time.
The goal
was to create an arms-length transaction in which the QI (or an entity
created by the QI) acquired either the relinquished property or the
replacement property for the taxpayer and created an exchange, which
should otherwise fall within the rules and regulations relating to
deferred exchanges. The exchange-first and exchange-last approaches became
known as parking arrangements because the QI "parks" one of the properties
in the QI's name to prevent the exchanger from owning both properties
simultaneously.
The problem of constructive ownership arose in
these transactions. Although the QI held title to the property, all the
benefits and burdens of ownership were transferred to the exchanger.
Questions regarding management of the parked property, loan
arrangements, taxpayer advances to fund the acquisition, exit strategy,
fixed price versus fair market value and who was to receive the tax
benefits of ownership while the property was parked were common. If the
taxpayer retained all the burdens and benefits of ownership while mere
legal title was parked, it was feared the taxpayer would be treated as
actually owning both the relinquished and the replacement properties at
the same time.
New Rules for Reverse, Improvement
Exchanges
After years of deliberation, the IRS has
validated the parking arrangements described previously, as long as the
exchange is completed within 180 days. Revenue Procedure 2000-37, enacted
Sept. 15, 2000, creates a "safe harbor" for exchanges in which a third
party called the "exchange accommodation titleholder" (EAT) enters into a
parking arrangement and acquires title to either the relinquished or
replacement property. This applies to reverse and improvement exchanges.
More on improvement exchanges follows.
The EAT is the entity that
parks the property. The EAT and QI can be the same, but preferably the EAT
is a separate entity formed by the QI specifically for an exchange.
Strategically applied, the new rules offer investors enhanced investment
alternatives.
Seize a Buying Opportunity.
Investors can now immediately acquire a desirable
replacement property before selling the relinquished property. Many
commercial investors are using this strategy, particularly in markets
where inventory of properties is low or turns over quickly. Investors can
purchase their next investment property as soon as a good buy is
available.
Guarantee Exchange's Buying End.
The new rules can reduce the pressure associated with finding a
replacement property within the 45-day identification period. Thousands of
commercial transactions fail to close each year because investors are
unable to locate suitable investments within the 45-day identification
period constraints. A replacement property can now be purchased before
selling the relinquished property. This transfers the time crunch from the
purchasing phase to the selling phase.
Create an
Investment.
Investors can build their investment properties from the ground up or
improve an existing property (as long as the property is in the EAT's
name) to create an investment that meets their exact needs. Many Texas
investors are using tax-deferred dollars to build new warehouses or office
buildings that meet their particular requirements rather than being
limited to properties available on the market. This type of exchange
provides tremendous flexibility because a certificate of occupancy is not
required within the 180-day exchange period to meet the requirements for
full tax deferral. The taxpayer can count improvements built and paid for
during the 180-day exchange period, whether the project is complete or
not.
More investors are combining a reverse exchange with an
improvement exchange by purchasing a new property and making improvements
to the property before the relinquished property is sold.
Converting Rental to Residence
Investors
can combine the tax deferral benefits of an exchange with the tax
exclusion advantages available under the primary residence tax rules
(Internal Revenue Code 121). Exchanging into a replacement property that
is initially held for investment and later converted from rental property
into a primary residence enables a property owner to obtain tax-free
funds.
Under the primary residence tax rules, anyone living in a
property as their primary residence for 24 months out of a 60-month period
can exclude from taxable income $250,000 (if filing single) or $500,000
(if married filing jointly) of the gain from the sale of their home. This
exclusion is available once every two years.
Vacation
Homes and Tenants-in-Common
Real estate located in resort
or vacation areas may qualify for an exchange if owners can establish that
their intent was to hold the property for investment. Property owners in
many resort destinations nationwide are deferring 100 percent of their
capital gain taxes and exchanging for more desirable properties.
IRS rules have long allowed an owner to sell a whole property and
purchase an undivided interest in another property, becoming a "tenant in
common" (TIC) with other owners of the real estate.
Increasingly, owners of shopping centers anchored by national tenants
like supermarkets are selling fractional ownership interests in such
centers. These are called TIC/NNN programs because tenant-in-common
interests are sold in centers managed largely by the tenants through
triple-net leases.
Investors participate in the benefits of larger commercial projects
that often result in a relatively passive investment generating a
predictable monthly cash flow. However, each such investment must be
closely examined for economic and legal viability.
Real estate cannot be exchanged for personal property, such as a
partnership interest or REIT stock. Therefore, a taxpayer must be
satisfied that the substance of the transaction, and not just the form, is
still a real estate purchase. On March 19, 2002, the IRS issued Revenue
Procedure 2002-22, specifying the conditions under which the IRS will
consider a request for a ruling that an undivided interest in rental real
estate will be considered an interest in real estate and not an interest
in a partnership or "business entity." While this procedure does not
constitute a safe-harbor that automatically validates any program, the
advance-ruling requirements are likely to become a litmus test for many
sponsors of TIC programs.
Unlike Monopoly players, real estate investors do not have to depend on
a roll of the dice to pass go and collect more money. Savvy Texas property
owners are using tax-deferred exchanges to acquire desirable Boardwalk and
Park Place properties and win the investment game.
This information is not intended to replace qualified legal or tax
advisors. Taxpayers should review their specific transactions with their
own legal or tax counsel.
Lehrmann (greg@apiexchange.com) is an
attorney board certified in commercial and residential real estate law by
the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He is Texas Division Manager for
Asset Preservation, Inc., a 1031 Qualified Intermediary
Article Provided by:
Greg Lehrmann Asset Preservation,
Inc. |